How to Choose the Right AI Model

Modified on Mon, 2 Jun at 9:48 AM

With various AI models available on TeamPal, you can select the one that best suits your business task, balancing performance, cost-effectiveness, and specific use-case requirements. This guide breaks down the differences between available models and provides tips to help you make the right choice.

Define Your Business Goals

Before choosing an AI model, ask yourself:

What task needs to be automated or supported? (e.g., customer support, writing, data analysis)
How complex is the task? Does it require detailed, nuanced comprehension or just basic content?
What is your credit budget for running the model?

Understanding the scope and complexity of your task will help narrow down the options.

Overview of TeamPal's AI Models

TeamPal provides a range of AI models, each tailored for different use cases and credit consumption. Here’s a quick comparison to help you get started:

AI Model	Cost per Request	Best for	Strengths
GPT 4o Mini	1 credit	General tasks with basic language understanding.	Cost-effective for basic automation or simple text generation.
GPT 4o	15 credits	Tasks involving skills, integrations, and complex handling.	Highly versatile with robust problem-solving capabilities.
o3 Mini (Reasoning)	5 credits	Science, math, and coding-focused tasks.	Strikes a balance between cost-efficiency and enhanced performance compared to basic models.
GPT 4.1 Mini	3 credits	General tasks with improved performance.	Provides a balance between intelligence, speed, and cost for versatile use cases.
GPT 4.1	15 credits	Complex tasks requiring nuanced comprehension.	Advanced model for detailed problem-solving and high-quality content across domains.
Claude 3.5 Haiku	1 credit	Basic content creation and general text generation.	Economical with a strong performance for straightforward writing tasks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet	10 credits	Creating detailed articles, narratives, and nuanced writing.	Enhanced contextual understanding for more sophisticated content generation.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning)	15 credits	Sophisticated content creation with deep comprehension.	Premium model for refined writing and nuanced understanding.
Gemini 1.5 Pro	20 credits	Complex tasks requiring a deep understanding of context.	Top-tier performance for intricate tasks and high-priority processing.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite	1 credit	Cost-efficient and low-latency tasks.	Optimized for affordability and quick responses.
Gemini 2.0 Flash	2 credits	Fast and cost-effective processing of general and moderately complex tasks.	Optimized for balancing speed and accuracy with efficient processing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Reasoning)	15 credits	Advanced reasoning over complex problems in code, math, and STEM.	Google’s state-of-the-art model for analyzing large datasets, codebases, and documents using long context.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (Reasoning)	15 credits	Fast reasoning tasks with balanced speed and depth.	Ideal for efficient problem-solving with analytical depth.
Deepseek R1 (Reasoning)	5 credits	Complex analytical tasks requiring logical precision.	Cost-saving model specializing in advanced reasoning and detailed analysis.
Grok 3 Mini (Reasoning)	2 credits	Logic-based tasks that do not require deep domain knowledge.	Lightweight model that thinks before responding. Fast, smart, and provides raw thinking traces. Excels at reasoning tasks.
Grok 3	20 credits	Enterprise tasks like data extraction, programming, and text summarization.	Beta model with cutting-edge capabilities for complex problem-solving.

Key Factors to Evaluate Before Choosing

The model you choose depends on three key factors.

Task Requirements

Simple text generation or content: GPT 4o Mini, Claude 3.5 Haiku, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite provide excellent, budget-friendly options.

Moderately complex language comprehension: Opt for o3 Mini, GPT 4.1 Mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash, or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking for balanced performance and affordability.

Detailed, nuanced writing: Choose GPT 4.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, or Claude 3.7 Sonnet for sophisticated content creation.

Fast automated operations: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite, Gemini 2.0 Flash, or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking are your go-to models for quick responses.

High-priority, advanced reasoning tasks: Use o3 Mini, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview, Deepseek R1, or Grok 3 for complex analytical tasks or mission-critical processes.

Budget and Credit Usage

Cost-effective use: GPT 4o Mini, Claude 3.5 Haiku, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite ensure great efficiency at just 1 credit. These are budget-friendly options for small teams or startups.

Intermediate cost and performance: o3 Mini, GPT 4.1 Mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Deepseek R1 offer a middle ground for users requiring enhanced processing while keeping credit consumption manageable.

For performance without limits: Models like GPT 4o, GPT 4.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview, and Grok 3 consume more credits but provide unmatched quality in handling critical or highly complex tasks.

Balance Between Speed and Quality

For quick responses: Go with models like Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite, Gemini 2.0 Flash, or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

For quality and depth: Opt for GPT 4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview.

For content-heavy tasks, favor Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, or GPT 4o, or GPT 4.1 based on your accuracy and expense tolerance.

For mission-critical, high-resource tasks, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview, Gemini 1.5 Pro, or Grok 3 are the best choices for detailed performance.

Reasoning Models

If your tasks require logical precision, advanced reasoning, or problem-solving, consider the following models:

o3 Mini: Ideal for science, math, and coding-focused tasks with reasoning capabilities.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Excels at sophisticated content creation with deep comprehension and reasoning.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview: Google’s state-of-the-art model for advanced reasoning over complex problems in code, math, and STEM.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Balances speed and depth for fast reasoning tasks.
Deepseek R1: Specializes in logical precision and detailed analysis.
Grok 3 Mini: Lightweight model for logic-based tasks with raw thinking traces.
Grok 3: xAI’s flagship model for enterprise tasks like data extraction, programming, and text summarization.

Tips for Getting Started

Pilot test: Test models on your specific tasks before committing significant credits.
Adjust as you scale: Start with economical models (e.g., GPT 4o Mini, Claude 3.5 Haiku, or Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite) and scale up to advanced models (e.g., GPT 4.1, o3 Mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview, or Claude 3.7 Sonnet) as your requirements become more complex.
Explore integrations: Leverage TeamPal's model compatibility with different skills to enhance functionality.

When in Doubt?

If you’re still unsure which model to choose, feel free to contact TeamPal Support at support@teampal.ai. We’ll help you evaluate your requirements and recommend the best fit for your specific business needs.

Disclaimer: This article is written in the voice of Nate, a fictional character created for user adoption and branding purposes, you'll also meet him and some other characters in our onboarding emails. If you’ve grown attached… our mission is completed! ;) – a happy marketing employee

Choose GPT 4.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, or Claude 3.7 Sonnet for sophisticated content creation.

Was this article helpful?